نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار، گروه حقوق، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه بین المللی امام خمینی، قزوین، ایران
2 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد حقوق جزا وجرم شناسی ، گروه حقوق، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه بین المللی امام خمینی، قزوین، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
With the advance in criminal law thoughts, the emergence of redevelopment concepts, and the defeated party’s rehabilitation, Jurists' and thinkers’ attempts have led to the formation of a specialized judicial institution to supervise punishment execution.
Although France and Iran's legislators comply with the principle of presiding judge specialization, the organizational position of presiding institutions and punishments included in their presiding are disparate. France's legislator has assigned the responsibility of supervising the punishment execution to the Judge Applicator of the Punishments that is chosen among the passing judges. Whereas, Iran legislators have predicted the execution judge of criminal judgment works under the directorship of the prosecutor, supervision on the punishment execution of this judge is not limited to punishment execution resulting in deprivation of freedom and restricting freedom.
Undoubtedly, meaningful judicial supervision won’t be ascertained with the judge's interference in the process of execution to pursue the punishment execution. On one hand, this supervision required an independent and impartial judge’s interference as a presiding judge which needs judicial experience and knowledge of criminal dos and don'ts. On the other hand, binding supervising jurisdictions and a position higher than presiding administrative authorities on punishment execution should be predicted.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)