نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
نویسنده
استادیار، گروه حقوق جزا و جرمشناسی، دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
The innovations in the new draft of the Islamic Penal Code concerning forgery and the use of forged documents include the identification of additional forms of this crime and related conduct, logical categorization of its natural and legal perpetrators, more precise elaboration of intellectual forgery, the inclusion of currency counterfeiting and mutilation within the scope of forgery, consolidation of provisions governing banknote forgery along with modifications, and the revision of the quantity and quality of some sanctions. Nevertheless, the implemented changes do not entirely remedy the deficiencies of previous regulations. Despite its necessity, the draft has neglected to criminalize certain acts contrary to public interest related to forgery, such as the transportation and possession of forged documents and objects—particularly money and currency—as well as the manufacture, possession, and trade of tools used for such acts. Furthermore, the intervention of legal persons in this domain is inadequately addressed, with emphasis only placed on the violation of research rules and ethics. Additionally, where indirect reference is made to intellectual forgery attributed to the personnel of governmental institutions, it lacks specific provisions and differential sanctions. In any case, this research, employing a descriptive-analytical method and using library resources, discusses the positive and negative aspects of the approach taken by the aforementioned draft.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)